SARS and the Warning Signs
Learning Objectives
Students will be able to:
- Describe the 2003 SARS outbreak and how it was contained
- Explain what superspreading events are and why they matter
- Identify evidence that SARS spread through the air
- Evaluate why the lessons from SARS weren't fully applied to COVID-19
A Warning Ignored
In 2003, a new coronavirus emerged. We should have been ready for its successor.
SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) killed about 800 people worldwide before being contained. It demonstrated exactly how a coronavirus could spread through the air—but many of these lessons were forgotten or ignored when COVID-19 emerged 17 years later.
SARS by the Numbers
The Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| Nov 2002 | First cases appear in Guangdong Province, China |
| Feb 2003 | Dr. Liu Jianlun, infected in Guangzhou, stays at Hong Kong hotel; spreads virus to at least 16 guests |
| Mar 2003 | Cases appear in Vietnam, Singapore, Canada; WHO issues global alert |
| Apr 2003 | Amoy Gardens outbreak in Hong Kong: 329 cases in one apartment building |
| Jul 2003 | WHO declares SARS contained; last human case |
Superspreading Events
Definition: An event where one infected person transmits the virus to many others—far more than typical.
Key SARS Superspreading Events
| Event | Setting | Infections | What Happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hotel Metropole | Hong Kong hotel | 16+ | One sick doctor infected guests on same floor; they spread virus to multiple countries |
| Amoy Gardens | Apartment building | 329 | Virus spread through building's plumbing/ventilation system |
| Hospital wards | Multiple hospitals | Hundreds | Healthcare workers infected while using insufficient protection |
Pattern: Most SARS patients infected few or no others. But a small percentage of patients—in the right (or wrong) conditions—infected dozens.
The Amoy Gardens Mystery
This outbreak revealed that SARS could spread through the air in unexpected ways.
What Happened
- One patient with diarrhea visited relatives in Building E
- Within days, 329 residents were infected—mostly in Building E
- Cases were concentrated in apartments stacked vertically above each other
- Many infected residents had never met the original patient
The Investigation Found
- Virus particles were aerosolized from contaminated sewage
- A faulty bathroom exhaust system spread virus-laden air between apartments
- Dried-out U-traps in floor drains allowed sewer gases to enter apartments
- Prevailing winds carried particles to other buildings
Conclusion: SARS could spread through airborne routes, not just close-range droplets.
Evidence of Airborne Spread
What the Evidence Showed
- Infections occurred beyond 6 feet
- Healthcare workers got infected despite droplet precautions
- Virus spread through building ventilation systems
- Certain "aerosol-generating" procedures were high-risk
- N95 masks provided better protection than surgical masks
What Happened to This Knowledge
- Some researchers documented airborne spread
- But official guidance still emphasized "droplets"
- N95s recommended mainly for "aerosol-generating procedures"
- Ventilation improvements were not widely implemented
- Focus shifted to other threats; SARS seemed "contained"
How SARS Was Contained
Successful Strategies
- Early detection: Aggressive testing and contact tracing
- Isolation: Infected patients were isolated quickly
- Quarantine: Exposed contacts were monitored
- Healthcare infection control: Hospitals improved protocols
- Travel restrictions: Affected areas were avoided
- International cooperation: WHO coordinated global response
Key factor: SARS patients were mainly contagious when symptomatic, making it easier to identify and isolate them before they spread the virus.
Why SARS Was Different from COVID-19
| Factor | SARS (2003) | COVID-19 (2020) |
|---|---|---|
| Spread before symptoms | Rare | Common (40-50% of transmission) |
| Case fatality rate | ~10% | ~1% (varies) |
| Mild cases | Rare | Very common |
| Detectability | Easy to find sick people | Many spreaders didn't know they were infected |
| Containment | Possible with isolation | Much harder due to pre/asymptomatic spread |
Paradox: COVID-19's lower fatality rate made it more dangerous at a population level because infected people felt well enough to spread it widely.
Discussion Questions
- Why do you think the lessons from SARS about airborne transmission weren't widely applied?
- How did the Amoy Gardens outbreak change our understanding of how respiratory diseases can spread?
- If SARS had not been contained, how might history have been different?
- What systems or preparations could have been put in place between 2003 and 2020 to better handle the next pandemic?
Activity: Outbreak Investigation
Analyze the Amoy Gardens Outbreak
Using the information provided, create a diagram showing:
- How the virus entered the building
- How it spread between apartments
- What building features contributed to spread
- What interventions could have prevented spread
Questions to Consider
- Why were apartments stacked vertically most affected?
- What role did the ventilation system play?
- How could building design be improved to prevent similar outbreaks?
- What would you recommend for apartment building safety today?
Key Takeaway
SARS was a warning shot. It demonstrated that coronaviruses could spread through the air, that superspreading events could amplify outbreaks, and that ventilation and building design matter for infection control. Although SARS was contained, many of its lessons about airborne transmission were not fully incorporated into pandemic planning—setting the stage for history to repeat with COVID-19.